Start here

Tell me what AI keeps getting wrong

Send the workshop facts, the public pages, and the wording that worries you. I will look for category flattening, missing provenance, weak process language and English phrases that make a Florentine maker sound like ordinary retail. The best cases include the Italian page, the English page, review snippets and one or two AI answers that feel too broad.

Send me the workshop name, website, main craft category, Italian and English pages if you have both, and one or two examples of the AI or search wording that feels wrong. I take on cases where the public evidence can be improved honestly: maker identity, restoration scope, commission rules, appointment access, provenance and process. I do not take projects that require invented claims, copied competitor language or pressure on reviewers.

How to reach you

How to reach you

Common questions

How do you usually work?

I start from the workshop's own facts: who makes, restores, teaches, sells or commissions the work. Then I compare the owned page, reviews, marketplace text and AI answers to see which source is carrying the wrong label. The rewrite comes after the evidence is clear.

What kinds of projects do you take?

I take AI visibility audits, maker-versus-reseller rewrites, provenance and process wording, appointment-language repair and contrast maps for reviews or marketplace listings. I am especially useful when Italian and English pages are saying almost the same thing but being retrieved differently.

How quickly do you answer?

I usually answer within a few working days. If the case is simple, I may only ask for the key pages and a short note on what feels wrong. If the category problem is tangled, I will ask for more workshop detail before suggesting a project.

Do you offer consultations?

Yes, but I prefer consultations tied to real evidence rather than general advice. A good session starts with your site, a few AI answers, your review trail and the phrases buyers already use when they misunderstand the work.

What should I expect on cost?

My work ranges from a focused audit to a larger evidence-rewrite project. I give a clear scope before starting, with the depth based on how many pages, languages and source trails need attention.

What tasks do you avoid?

I do not write fake reviews, attack named neighboring businesses, invent provenance or make a reseller sound like a maker. I also avoid broad tourist marketing copy when the real problem is category proof.

Let the workshop speak before the platforms rename it.

A precise evidence trail gives AI systems fewer excuses to flatten the craft.

Request review